Wednesday, June 8, 2011

Soy label misleads

New “responsible” soy label misleads consumers
ASEED Europe
June 08, 2011

On Wednesday, June 8th, 2011, the first highly controversial cerificates for “responsible” soy is issued to companies such as Ahold and FrieslandCampina, during a ceremony in Rotterdam. The new certificates were initiated by the World Wildlife Fund and will be marketed by the Round Table on Responsible Soy (RTRS). One certificate covers one tonne of soy products: beans, flour or oil. [1] ASEED is present to protest against this label’s greenwashing of toxic soy production.

The new label has been dismissed by hundreds of organisations as “greenwashing”. Networks including Friends of the Earth International, Global Forest Coalition, Platform Aarde, Boer, Consument (ABC) en Food & Water Watch wrote a letter to warn supermarkets not to cooperate with this misleading label. 23,000 consumers sent petitions with similar messages. [2]

“This soylabel is a typical example of consumer deceit”, says Nina Holland of Corporate Europe Observatory: “Importing soy for industrial livestock farming in the Netherlands is inherently unsustainable. Apart from that the soy is produced with intensive use of agrotoxins. Even genetically manipulated soy that is resistant to the herbicide Roundup can be called ‘responsible’.

The criteria for responsible soy are very weak. It is responsible to spray pesticides from airplanes close to homes and there are no limits on pesticide use. Land that is still covered in forest today can be used to produce ‘responsible’ soy tomorrow. The label offers no solution to the struggle for land that is being fought in countries like Paraguay between smallholder farmers and the agri-industry.

The new label is financed by the Dutch government and the industry. They have enormous financial interests in the 9 million tonnes of soy that are imported into the Netherlands each year. But countries like France, Sweden, Norway and Germany are moving in the opposite direction; the demand for GMO-free products is growing and companies are switching to GMO-free feed for production of meat, eggs and dairy.

“What is remarkable is that the launching of this soy label in Rotterdam is organised by Schuttelaar & Partners, the same advertising agency that organised the introduction into the Netherlands of RoundupReady soy on behalf of the Monsanto company. The Marketing Board for corporate social responsibility MVO was also actively involved in this PR campaign”, says Tjerk Dalhuisen van gifsoja.nl. [3]

Notes:

[1] The Round Table for Responsible Soy Association (RTRS) is a collection of corporations that are involved in the production, trade and processing of soy and includes Unilever, Ahold, Cargill and Monsanto. The Dutch government supports the label through the IDH, Initiative for Sustainable Trade.

[2] The criticism is summarized in a short animation film: http://bit.ly/gifsoja-animatie

Last year 230 farmers-, environmental – and development organisations from Latin-America and Europe criticised the greenwashing of toxic soy. On top of that a coalition of organisations recently asked the European supermarket chains to stop deceiving consumers with false labels. The umbrella organisation of German nature conservation groups (DNR) asked the World Wildlife Fund to step out of the RTRS and to ’stop supporting a failed agricultural model’

More information about the problems with soy and the ‘responsible’ certification as well as an analysis of the RTRS criteria can be found on : www.toxicsoy.org

[3] As the monthly Milieudefensie (Friends of the Earth NL) magazine reported, Monsanto hired Schuttelaar & Partners in order to prevent curious enquiries emerging during the introduction of Roundup-Ready soy in The Netherlands back in 1996. The Dutch MVO Marketing Board organised a promotional visit to the home base of Monsanto in St Louis (USA) at the time. Several employees of Schuttelaar & Partners later on confirmed that there was no evidence to support the claim that GM soy is environmentally friendly, although that message was emphasised in the PR campaign.

2012 archives
2011 archives
2010 archives
2009 archives
2008 archives
2007 archives
2006 archives
2005 archives
2004 archives
2003 archives
2002 archives

Search

Loading